USPTO serial 78247635
OCTANE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OCTANE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John McKie
JOHN MCKIE LADAS & PARRYSTE 1200224 S MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial investment, financial planning, financial research and financial management in the field of hedge funds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 24, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |