Drawing for EUBIONIC

USPTO serial 78247783

EUBIONIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3221233Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2007
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with EUBIONIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bujold

MICHAEL J BUJOLD DAVIS & BUJOLD PLLC112 PLEASANT STCONCORD, NH 03301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dental stoppings; dental impression materials and substances; dental amalgams; dental cement; dental alloys; dental varnish; porcelain for the manufacture of dental settings; dental adhesives; adhesives for dentures; dental packaging and dental facing materialSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
010Dental implants and artificial teeth; dentures made of plastic; plastic materials for making dentures; artificial limbs; dentures; dental caps; dental bridges; removable dentures; fixed dentures; dental braces, orthodontic appliances, tooth pins and supports, dental clamps, mixing pots and dental plates, plaster of Paris for dental purposes; rubber plates for dental purposes and surgical implantsSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Mar 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 21, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 23, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 31, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 5, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 27, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 26, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance