USPTO serial 78247783
EUBIONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 27, 2007
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EUBIONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bujold
MICHAEL J BUJOLD DAVIS & BUJOLD PLLC112 PLEASANT STCONCORD, NH 03301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dental stoppings; dental impression materials and substances; dental amalgams; dental cement; dental alloys; dental varnish; porcelain for the manufacture of dental settings; dental adhesives; adhesives for dentures; dental packaging and dental facing material | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Dental implants and artificial teeth; dentures made of plastic; plastic materials for making dentures; artificial limbs; dentures; dental caps; dental bridges; removable dentures; fixed dentures; dental braces, orthodontic appliances, tooth pins and supports, dental clamps, mixing pots and dental plates, plaster of Paris for dental purposes; rubber plates for dental purposes and surgical implants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eubionic Dental GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Eubionic Dental GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Eubionic Dental GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named EUBIONIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |