Drawing for MARCO POLO BOATS

USPTO serial 78248175

MARCO POLO BOATS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARCO POLO BOATS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Personal watercraft, namely, row boats, sail boats, motor boats, pedal boats, and other leisure craft, namely, electric boats, jon boats, pontoon boats, recreational jet craft, hoover craft, kayak-like boats, and raftsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 13, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 24, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 24, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 6, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 19, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 19, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 28, 2004GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance