USPTO serial 78248346
PARTSZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARTSZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Wales, PA
North Wales, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William P. Smith
ELIZABETH K BROCK HARNESS DICKEY & PIERCE PLC5445 CORPORATE DR STE 400TROY, MI 48098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online ordering services in the field of replacement parts and accessories for aerial work platforms, cranes, telehandlers, forklifts, asphalt and concrete paving equipment, compaction equipment, crawler loaders, dozer-crawler wheels, excavators, loader backhoes, skid steers, wheel loaders, and personnel and burden carriers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |