Drawing for DAISY DUKES

USPTO serial 78248508

DAISY DUKES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3370132Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 15, 2008
Examiner
CASTRO, GIANCARLO
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with DAISY DUKES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Vinterella

ROBERT M KAGAN JR, LLC201 ST. CHARLES AVENUE, SUITE 2513NEW ORLEANS, LA 70170-1000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043RestaurantsACTIVEJun 1, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2018NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2018RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 29, 201889AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 29, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 8, 2018E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 15, 2017REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2014A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Nov 14, 2014EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2014PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Sep 24, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 13, 2014ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED—
Dec 10, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 10, 2013815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Dec 9, 2013EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2013PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Nov 11, 2013PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Nov 11, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 24, 2013E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2013TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Aug 6, 2013CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 6, 2013CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Jun 4, 2013PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 3, 2013ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 15, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 12, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 6, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 8, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 18, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 18, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 17, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 1, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 14, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 1, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 1, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 30, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 30, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 25, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 26, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 11, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 26, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 10, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 27, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance