Drawing for MINICARB

USPTO serial 78248541

MINICARB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINICARB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANN LAMPORT HAMMITTE

ANN LAMPORT HAMMITTE LOWRIE LANDO & ANASTASI LLPONE MAIN STCAMBRIDGE, MA 02142UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Meal replacement beveragesACTIVE—
029Foods and food beverages for people on carbohydrate-controlled diets or for people who wish to lower their overall intake of carbohydrates, namely, soy-based salty and sweet snacks; pork rinds; shelf stable, refrigerated and frozen prepared entrees and side dishes consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetablesACTIVE—
030Teas; rice; breads; cereal preparations, namely, cereal based snack food, processed cereals and ready-to-eat, prepared breakfast cereal, and granola; flours; pancake mixes; instant hot breakfast cereals; mixes for bakery goods; pizza crust mixes; tortilla chips; frozen, packaged, and prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; flavoring extracts; grain-based beverages; grain-based food beverages; herbal food beverages; ready-to-eat cereal-based food bars; spices; refrigerated and frozen prepared entrees and side dishes consisting primarily of pasta or rice; desserts, namely, cheesecakes, ice cream, and chocolate-based candy; condiments, namely, salad dressings, marinades, and saucesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 26, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 24, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 24, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 21, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance