USPTO serial 78248669
HYDRAMAX4
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYDRAMAX4?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Burlington, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah Robertson
SARAH ROBERTSON DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP15TH FL250 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10177Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Hydraulically powered surface and underground heavy industrial trucks, load haul and dump vehicles and utility vehicles; Hydraulically powered surface and underground heavy industrial trucks, load haul and dump vehicles and utility vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |