USPTO serial 78248700
THE SANDHANDLER SANDBLAST AND ABRASIVE RECOVERY SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SANDHANDLER SANDBLAST AND ABRASIVE RECOVERY SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | THE SANDHANDLER SANDBLAST AND ABRASIVE RECOVERY SYSTEM IS A COMPLETELY ENCLOSED AUTOMATIC/SEMI-AUTOMATIC SANDBLASTING MACHINE AND CONTINUOUS ABRASIVE RECOVERY SYSTEM IN A RUBBER LINED SANDBLAST BOOTH THE ENTIRE SYSTEM CONSISTS OF A TOTALLY ENCLOSED AND SEALED RUBBER LINED BOOTH, THE SANDBLAST MACHINE AND ABRASIVE RECOVERY SYSTEM THE SANDBLAST MACHINE IS DESIGNED TO MAKE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL MOVEMENTS TO PROPEL A PLATFORM THAT HOLDS A SANDBLAST NOZZLE AND HOSE ATTACHMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF SANDBLASTING VARIOUS SPECIFIC AREAS ON STONE OR OTHER APPLICABLE MATERIALS, SUCH AS MARBLE, STEEL, AND WOOD THE MACHINE IS DRIVEN BY HYDRAULIC POWER HYDRAULIC MOTORS PROPEL BOTH THE VERTICAL MOVEMENT AND THE HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT THE HYDRAULIC MOTORS ARE CONTROLLED BY COMPUTER GENERATED IMPULSES ON THE FULLY AUTOMATIC MODEL IT IS POSSIBLE AS APPLICABLE, TO POWER THE DRIVE UNITS ON THE MACHINE WITH THE USE OF SEALED ELECTRIC MOTORS THE SEMI-AUTOMATIC HYDRAULICALLY OPERATED MODEL REPLACES THE COMPUTER GENERATED MOVEMENTS WITH THE ADDITION OF VALVE OPERATED HYDRAULIC JOYSTICKS MOUNTED AT THE OUTSIDE FRONT OF THE BOOTH, TO BE ORCHESTRATED BY THE OPERATOR MANUALLY THE SANDHANDLER SANDBLAST AND ABRASIVE RECOVERY SYSTEM MACHINE PROVIDES EXTREMELY ACCURATE CONTROL OF THE SANDBLAST NOZZLE IN ITS VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL MOVEMENTS WITH THE MACHINE MOUNTED INSIDE A SEALED SANDBLAST BOOTH AND OPERATED FROM OUTSIDE OF THE SANDBLAST BOOTH ALL THE COMPONENTS AND PARTS OF THE SAND OR ABRASIVE SCREENING AND RECOVERING SYSTEM ARE SEALED AND CREATE A CONTINUOUS CYCLE ALLOWING DUST FREE SANDBLAST OPERATION WITHOUT LOSS OF SAND OR ABRASIVE MATERIALS, THE TOTALLY SEALED SANDBLAST BOOTH IS CONSTRUCTED WITH TUBULAR STEEL, OR WOOD, OR PIPE SUPERSTRUCTURE THE SUPERSTRUCTURE FRAMES THE SAND RECOVERY BINS, THE ENTRY AND EXIT DOORS, THE VIEWING WINDOW, THE WALLS, THE CEILING, AND THE ROLLER CONVEYOR SUPPORT | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |