USPTO serial 78248744
SID SURFASAURUS THE SURFING DINOSAUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SID SURFASAURUS THE SURFING DINOSAUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley P. Hartman
BRADLEY P HARTMAN STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLPSTE 21001850 N CENTRAL AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85004-4584Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded compact discs, CD-ROMs, phonograph records, audio tapes, video tapes and DVDs featuring music, theatrical shows, children's shows, music concerts, music shows, and cartoons; computer game software and video game software prerecorded on CD-ROMs and DVDs; glasses, sunglasses and accessories for sunglasses, namely sunglass cases and sunglass cords | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Surfnaur Enterprises Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Surfnaur Enterprises Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SID SURFASAURUS THE SURFING DINOSAUR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| May 30, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |