Drawing for CERTUS

USPTO serial 78249069

CERTUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CERTUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009retail inventory hardware comprised of antennas placed on shelves, radio frequency interrogators, radio-frequency identification tags to be placed on products, and data processing computers and software; warehouse tracking system comprised of antennas placed on forklifts or clamp trucks, radio frequency interrogators, radio frequency identification tags placed on inventory items, radio communication devices to transmit data from forklift truck to data processing computers and software, a radio frequency location system comprising antennas on lift or clamp truck, RFID (Radio Frequency Identification Device) tags embedded in floor of warehouse; inventory tracking system, comprising wireless network, GPS (Global Positioning System) location determination hardware and software, radio frequency identification tags to be placed on inventory, RFID (Radio Frequency Identification Device) interrogators to determine location of inventory inside of freight containers or trucks, data processing computer and softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 27, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 11, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 11, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance