USPTO serial 78249093
COMPLETE DESSERTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2890576Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 2004
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMPLETE DESSERTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexandra M. Sepulveda
Alexandra M. Sepulveda General Mills, Inc.Number One General Mills Blvd.MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55426UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Dessert mixes, namely, packaged kits containing baking mixes for [cobblers, crisps,] cakes, [pies, and other baked desserts] and one or more of the following-- processed fruit, chocolate, fudge, caramel, nuts, and candy pieces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 25, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by General Mills, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by General Mills, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL MILLS MARKETING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL MILLS MARKETING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL MILLS MARKETING, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named COMPLETE DESSERTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 1, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 7, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 7, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |