USPTO serial 78249104
PLUGINZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLUGINZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Miami Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert S. Lott, Esq.
ROBERT S LOTT ESQ ROBERT S. LOTT, ATTORNEY AT LAW715 RIVERSIDE DRSAN JOSE, CA 95125UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Pluginz, Inc is providing customers in the internet, graphic design and entertainment industries with products, information, training, resources and an online community Our products consist of computer software and digital content, specifically-- software applications, plugins, digital tools, extensions and upgrades available as physical products and digital downloads Our content consists of digital media, specifically-- three dimensional models, images, video and audio clips Our information is in the form of online customer assistance, specically-- industry news, software news, press releases, product reviews and event listings Our training is in the form of online customer assistance, specifically-- tutorials, tips, tricks, customer support, and answers to frequently asked questions Our resources are for our customers and vendors, specifically-- business management tools, retail and distibution channels, development assistance for manufacturers, an online job center to assist our customers in finding jobs and expanding their careers, and an online auction engine for our customers Our online community is for our users, customers and digital artists providing them with resources, specifically-- news groups, forums, communication tools, user support, an online gallery in which to display their work, and a magazine that is published monthly for our users | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |