Drawing for TIMID T TURTLE

USPTO serial 78249246

TIMID T TURTLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIMID T TURTLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David E. Rogers

DAVID E ROGERS SQUIRE SANDERS & DEMPSEY LLPTWO RENAISSANCE SQ 40 N CENTRALPHOENIX, AZ 85004-4498UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for playing games related to financial education, namely, software for playing games on a computer, on a video game, and via downloadable computer software on the internet or intranetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 23, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 13, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance