Drawing for KHL EXPRESS

USPTO serial 78249318

KHL EXPRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KHL EXPRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas A. Brackey II

THOMAS A BRACKEY II FREUND & BRACKEY LLP427 N CAMDEN DRBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006METAL STRAPPINGACTIVEJul 15, 2003
008HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, BANDING TOOLS AND BANDING TOOLS FOR NON-METAL STRAPPING; FLATWAREACTIVEJul 15, 2003
009SAFETY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, SAFETY GOGGLESACTIVEJul 15, 2003
016PAPER BAGS; ENVELOPES; PAPER SHIPPING POUCHES; PAPER NAPKINS; PAPER TABLE CLOTHS; PAPER TOWELS; TOILET PAPER; PAPER BOXES; CORRUGATED SHIPPING CONTAINERS; PAPER LABELS; PAPER TAPE; PRESSURE-SENSITIVE PAPER TAPE; CARDBOARD MAILING TUBES; PLASTIC BAGS; PLASTIC BUBBLE PACKAGING; PLASTIC WRAP; STATIC CONTROL BAGS FOR ELECTRONIC PARTS, NAMELY, PLASTIC BAGS FOR ELECTROSTATIC SENSITIVE DEVICES; MEDIA PACKAGING FOR ALBUMS, CDS AND TAPES, NAMELY, CORRUGATED CONTAINERSACTIVEJul 15, 2003
017MOLDED FOAM INSULATED CONTAINER CUSHIONING AND PACKING FOR COMMERCIAL TRANSPORTATION; STRAPPING TAPE; ADHESIVE TAPE FOR INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL USE, NAMELY, FILAMENT TAPE AND PACKING TAPE; PLASTIC STRETCH FILM FOR INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL PACKING USEACTIVEJul 15, 2003
020STATIC CONTROL PACKING CONTAINERS OF PLASTIC MATERIAL FOR STORING ELECTRONIC PARTS, NAMELY, PLASTIC CONTAINERS FOR ELECTROSTATIC DEVICESACTIVEJul 15, 2003
021STATIC CONTROL PORTABLE PLASTIC CONTAINERS FOR STORING HOUSEHOLD ELECTRONIC PARTS, NAMELY, PLASTIC CONTAINERS FOR ELECTROSTATIC DEVICESACTIVEJul 15, 2003
022NON-METAL STRAPPING; FABRIC MAILING POUCHESACTIVEJul 15, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2005CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 16, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 16, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 21, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 29, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 9, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance