USPTO serial 78249375
DEQX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEQX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LOUDSPEAKERS, AMPLIFIERS, HOME THEATER SYSTEMS COMPRISING AUDIO AND VIDEO RECEIVERS AND DVD PLAYERS, AUDIO CD, DVD AND HARD DISC PLAYERS FOR AUTOMOBILES AND AUDIO SPEAKERS AND AUDIO EQUALISERS AND AUDIO AMPLIFIERS FOR AUTOMOBILES, SOUND REINFORCEMENT AMPLIFIERS, SOUND REINFORCEMENT AUDIO SPEAKERS, SOUND REINFORCEMENT AUDIO SPEAKER CROSS-OVERS, SOUND REINFORCEMENT ACTIVE AUDIO CROSS-OVERS, AND SOUND REINFORCEMENT AUDIO EQUALISERS, DIGITAL AUDIO SOFTWARE FOR PLAYING HIGH-FIDELITY AUDIO VIA LOCAL AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND DIGITAL AUDIO SOFTWARE FOR MEASURING AND/OR ANALYSING AND/OR CORRECTING LOUDSPEAKER AND/OR ROOM ACOUSTICS; AUDIO SPEAKERS FOR PERSONAL COMPUTERS | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |