USPTO serial 78249498
EUROPEAN CHOCOLATE MASTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3080952Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 11, 2006
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EUROPEAN CHOCOLATE MASTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristin H. Altoff
Kristin H. Altoff Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP1111 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Attn: TMSUWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others in the field of candy through the distribution of printed material; wholesale distributorships featuring candy | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 21, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BARRY CALLEBAUT AG
- Other trademarks owned by BARRY CALLEBAUT AG
- Other trademarks owned by Sonafi S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Sonafi S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named EUROPEAN CHOCOLATE MASTERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 6, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 24, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 23, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |