USPTO serial 78249536
THE NEW TOWN AT ST. CHARLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2005
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE NEW TOWN AT ST. CHARLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
THE NEW TOWN AT ST. CHARLES GENERAL ASSEMBLY
ST. CHARLES, MO
Other trademarks owned by THE NEW TOWN AT ST. CHARLES GENERAL ASSEMBLY
St. Peters, MO
St. Peters, MO
St. Peters, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad Goss
BRAD GOSS LAW OFFICE OF BRAD GOSS LLC21 MARYHILL DRSAINT LOUIS, MO 63124UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Residential real estate agency and brokerage services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE NEW TOWN AT ST. CHARLES GENERAL ASSEMBLY
- Other trademarks owned by Whittaker Builders, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Whittaker Builders, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Whittaker Builders, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named THE NEW TOWN AT ST. CHARLES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |