USPTO serial 78249705
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell D. Kamarck
Mitchell D. Kamarck VIACOM INTERNATIONAL, INC.1515 BROADWAYC/O DIANE MANTARINGNEW YORK, NY 10036| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, Games and Playthings, namely, Toy Vehicles, Toy Action Figures and Accessories for use therewith; Dolls, Doll Clothing and Doll Accessories; Children's and Infant's Multiple Activity Toys; Plush Toys; Stuffed Toys; Plastic and Vinyl Toy Characters and Toy Animals; Toy Figures; Ride-On Toys; Push Toys; Pull Toys; Radio-Controlled Toy Vehicles; Mechanical Toys; Toy Construction Sets, Building Toys, Wind-Up Toys; Water Squirting Toys; Musical Toys; Inflatable Toys; Infant Toy Rattles; Jigsaw Puzzles; Equipment Sold as a unit for Playing Board, Parlor, Skill and Action, Card, Role-Playing, and Electronic Hand-Held Unit For Playing Games; Toy Sporting Equipment, namely, Footballs, Baseballs, Baseball Bats, Hockey Sticks and Pucks, Soccer Balls, Basketballs, Volleyballs, Foam Disc and Ball Shooters and Foam Toy Discs and Balls for use therewith | ACTIVE | Jan 22, 2003 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line interactive computer game. | ACTIVE | Jun 21, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |