USPTO serial 78249911
PHAT CYCLES CALIFORNIA USA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 4, 2005
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PHAT CYCLES CALIFORNIA USA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fountain Valley, CA
Fountain Valley, CA
Fountain Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KIT M. STETINA
KIT M STETINA STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE, STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | BICYCLES, BICYCLE PARTS AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, BEACH CRUISER BICYCLES, TANDEMS, FORKS, SADDLES, HANDLEBARS, GRIPS, CHAIN WHEELS, FRAMES, WHEELSETS, HUBS, RIMS, TIRES, AND PEDALS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |