Drawing for METAL ROOFING ISN'T WHAT IT USED TO BE

USPTO serial 78249977

METAL ROOFING ISN'T WHAT IT USED TO BE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2991623Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 6, 2005
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with METAL ROOFING ISN'T WHAT IT USED TO BE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip J. Foret

Philip J. Foret Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP2005 Market Street, Suite 2600Philadelphia, PA 19103United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Stone-coated steel roofing products, namely, roofing panels, roofing tiles, roofing shakes, roofing shingles, barge covers for roofs, ridge covers for roofs, roof-to-wall flashing, fascia flashing, valley caps for roofs, hip covers for roofsSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
019STONE-COATED STEEL ROOFING SLATESSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2026CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 14, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2024REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2015NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2015RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 24, 201589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 24, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 26, 2015E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2011NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 22, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 18, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 14, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 26, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 1, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 8, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance