Drawing for VEGEPURE

USPTO serial 78250275

VEGEPURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VEGEPURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire

MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA ESQ WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LL60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, FACIAL CLEANSERS, UNDER EYE CREAMS, FACIAL CREAMS, FACIAL EMULSIONS, FACIAL MASKS, AND FACIAL SCRUBS; BODY CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BODY CREAMS AND LOTIONS, HAND CREAMS AND LOTIONS, PERSONAL DEODORANTS, BODY SCRUBS, EXFOLIANTS FOR THE FACE AND BODY, NON-MEDICATED FOOT CREAMS AND LOTIONS, MASSAGE OILS; BATH PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BATH AND SHOWER GELS, BATH AND SHOWER FOAMS, BUBBLE BATHS, MILK BATHS, NON-MEDICATED BATH SALTS, BATH OILS, BATH CRYSTALS, BATH PEARLS, BODY WASHES, BATH POWDER, AND SKIN SOAP; COLOR COSMETICS; SCENTED PRODUCTS, NAMELY, PERFUMES, POTPOURRI, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, AND ESSENTIAL OILS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF SCENTED PRODUCTS; AND HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS, HAIR CLEANING PREPARATIONS, HAIR CONDITIONERS, HAIR RINSES, AND HAIR STYLING PREPARATIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 18, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 27, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 7, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 24, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 22, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 31, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 20, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 4, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance