USPTO serial 78250285
NYSNACKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2955967Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2005
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NYSNACKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald J. Baron
RONALD J BARON HOFFMANN & BARON LLP6900 JERICHO TPKESYOSSET, NY 11791UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Salty snacks, namely, potato chips, barbeque flavored potato chips, sea salt and vinegar flavored potato chips, potato sticks; banana chips; sweet and sour processed onion rings; preserved meats, namely, fried pork rinds, barbeque flavored pork rinds, fried pork skins, beef jerky, beef sausages in stick form, beef pepperoni and cheese sticks; pizza flavored potato sticks, pizza flavored potato chips, pizza flavored cheese, pizza flavored beef jerky; processed nuts, namely, cashews, peanuts, and pistachios; processed edible seeds, namely, sunflower seeds, party/bar mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 13, 2005 |
| 030 | Extruded snacks, namely, puffed cheese curls and crunchy nacho cheese curls; nacho cheese tortilla chips, baked blue corn tortilla chips, corn chips; pretzels; pizza flavored pretzels, crackers, namely, original, ranch, cheddar and white cheddar flavored crackers; cracker combinations, namely, cheese-filled and peanut butter filled sandwich crackers; party/bar mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; popped popcorn; multigrain chips | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 13, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 13, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 17, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |