Drawing for NEUSIEDLER PAPERINTELLIGENCE

USPTO serial 78250334

NEUSIEDLER PAPERINTELLIGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEUSIEDLER PAPERINTELLIGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ursula B. Day

Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Toner for photocopiers and printers; toner cartridges; printing heads for ink jet printers; accessories for copiers and printers, namely toner, ink, toner and ink cartridges and printing cartridges for inkjet printersACTIVE—
016Paper for use with copying machines and offset printers; paper for use in office communication, namely computer paper, writing paper, copier paper, fax transmission paper, laser paper, loose leaf paper; paper boards, paper bales, cardboard, namely for use in computer graphics and for packaging; plastic foils for copying and overhead projection; shipping labels and stickers; cardboard boxes; cardboard containers; stationery; packaging material from plastic namely, bags; accessories for copiers and printers, namely ink ribbons for printers and for cartridgesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 22, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 23, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance