Drawing for DIRECT INSIGHT 2D

USPTO serial 78250414

DIRECT INSIGHT 2D

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIRECT INSIGHT 2D?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank Farfan, Registration No. 35,773

TORONTO ONC - ONTARIO M5H 2L7FRANK FARFAN, REGISTR MACBETH & JOHNSONSTE 301 133 RICHMOND ST W,

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009software for processing video and two-dimensional images; software for controlling the processing of video and two-dimensional images and the distribution thereof to video and data projectors and monitors and to arrays of edge-butted flat panel video monitors; video and data projection systems namely video and data projectors and monitors, computers, projection screens and video display terminals, projection screens and video display terminalsACTIVE—
042design and development of computer software for processing video and two-dimensional images and the distribution thereof to video and data projectors and monitors; computer consulting services relating to software for processing video and two-dimensional images and the distribution thereof to audio/visual systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 6, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2003CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 5, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance