Drawing for RAY'S OWN BRAND

USPTO serial 78250645

RAY'S OWN BRAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RAY'S OWN BRAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas F. Lebens

THOMAS F LEBENS SINSHEIMER, SCHIEBELHUT & BAGGETT1010 PEACH STSAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024BlanketsABANDONED—
025Clothing, namely, hatsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 22, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 22, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 25, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 19, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 18, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2003CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance