Drawing for ELECTRIX

USPTO serial 78251066

ELECTRIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELECTRIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristine M. Miller

KRISTINE M MILLER ATTN: MICHELE CLARKHOLLAND & HART LLP555 17TH ST STE 3200 PO BOX 874DENVER, CO 80202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Lawn games, namely badminton game playing equipment, croquet sets, bocce balls, volleyball game playing equipment, namely volleyballs and volleyball nets; sports accessories, namely inflation needles for pumps for inflating sports equipment and pumps and hand pumps for inflating sports equipment, namely basketballs, footballs, volleyballs and soccer balls; basketball nets and cones; baseballs, baseball gloves, ball pitchback machines, mechanically-operated ball, strike and out counters used by umpires, glove repair kits; indoor activity games, namely table hockey playing equipment and table soccer playing equipment; sport balls, namely, basketballs, footballs, volleyballs, soccer balls, miniature toy balls, playground balls; sporting good toys, namely, plastic bats, baseballs, softballs, and baseball backstops, plastic golf clubs and accessories, namely, plastic golf balls, plastic tees and plastic golf clubs; and snow shoesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 6, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 3, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 14, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance