USPTO serial 78251082
RIVER SPHERE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3473581Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 2008
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RIVER SPHERE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
New Orleans, LA
Other trademarks owned by The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
New Orleans, LA
Other trademarks owned by The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
New Orleans, LA
Other trademarks owned by The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond G. Areaux
RAYMOND G. AREAUX CARVER, DARDEN, KORETZKY, ET AL.SUITE 31001100 POYDRAS STREETNEW ORLEANS, LA 70163Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Housewares, namely, beverageware, cups, and mugs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 29, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
- Other trademarks owned by The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
- Other trademarks owned by The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named RIVER SPHERE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |