USPTO serial 78251253
OMAHABEEF.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OMAHABEEF.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | IC 035 US 100 101 102 G and S-- electronic retailing services via a global computer network featuring food and food related products through a modern full-service boutique type e-commerce store that will specialize in selling the freshest and frozen highest quality seafood, beef, pork, poultry and game meats, etc Filets and steaks will be from-- tuna, salmon, tilapia, catfish, dolphin, bass, trout, cod, halibut, flounder, grouper, mackerel, beef tenderloin, filet mignon, ribeye, New York strip, t-bone, porterhouse, chicken breast and filets, pork tenderloin, pork filets, pork chops, buffalo/bison, venison, ostrich, alligator, and Yak, etc Additional items will be clams, crabs, lobsters, and oysters,cheese,caviar,fruits,vegetables,exotic plants, cycads etc | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |