USPTO serial 78251341
CC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
State College, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Elnitski, Jr.
JOHN J ELNITSKI JR JOHN J. ELNITSKI, JR.225 A SNOWBIRD LNBELLEFONTE, PA 16823UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | PRODUCTION AND LABORATORY EQUIPMENT FOR THE CHEMICAL MACHINING OF WORK PIECES, THE MAKING OF PRINTED CIRCUITS, AND THE MAKING OF PRINTING SURFACES AND ENGRAVINGS-NAMELY, CONVEYORIZED ETCHERS; BENCH-TYPE ETCHERS; APPARATUS FOR RINSING WORK PIECES; NEUTRALIZING APPARATUS; STRIPPING APPARATUS; BRIGHTENING APPARATUS; ETCHANT REGENERATION APPARATUS; BATCH ETCHERS; SPRAY ETCHERS; DOUBLE-SIDED SPRAY ETCHERS; SINGLE-SIDED SPRAY ETCHERS; PRINTED CIRCUIT ETCHERS; RESIST REMOVERS; POST-CLEANING APPARATUS; DRIERS FOR ETCHING EQUIPMENT; DEVELOPERS; RESIST STRIPPERS; COMBINATION SPRAY RINSE AND RESIST STRIPPING APPARATUS; RE-EXPOSURE APPARATUS; BRUSH-RESIST REMOVERS; RINSING APPARATUS; COMBINATION BRIGHTENER, RINSE AND COATING APPARATUS; CONTROL APPARATUS; AND DELIVERY AND CIRCULATION PUMPS, AND PARTS AND PIECES FOR SUCH GOODS | ACTIVE | Feb 4, 1959 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |