Drawing for ZOË

USPTO serial 78251807

ZOË

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZOË?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christa Cole

3RD FL12777 W JEFFERSON BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90066

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003NON-MEDICATED SKINCARE PREPARATIONS AND PRODUCTS, NAMELY CREAMS, GELS, LOTIONS, OILS, MOISTURIZERS, FOAMS, MOUSSES, CLEANSERS, SPRAYS, MISTS, CREAMS, POWDERS, AND FOUNDATIONS FOR THE FACE AND BODY; SUNCARE PREPARATIONS AND PRODUCTS, NAMELY GELS, LOTIONS, OILS, MOISTURIZERS, FOAMS, MOUSSES, CLEANSERS, SPRAYS, MISTS, CREAMS, POWDERS, FOUNDATIONS, SUNSCREENS, SPF's, SELF-TANNERS AND AFTER-SUN LOTIONS FOR THE FACE AND BODY, SUNSCREEN FOR THE LIPS, SPF FOR THE LIPS (INCLUDING TOPICAL PRODUCTS THAT PROVIDE PEOPLE WITH COSMETIC SKIN EFFECTS WHILE TANNING USING UV RADIATION, AND TOPICAL PRODUCTS THAT PROVIDE PEOPLE WITH A TAN APPEARANCE WITHOUT THE NEED FOR UV RADIATION EXPOSURE); COSMETICS, NAMELY, LIP TREATMENTS, LIP CREAM, LIP GEL, LIP BALM, LIP GLOSS, LIPSTICK, LIP LINER, LIP OIL, FACE POWDER, BRONZERS, BLUSH, MASCARA, FOUNDATION, EYEBROW PENCILS, EYE SHADOW, EYE LINER; NAIL CARE PRODUCTS; PERFUMES, SCENTED BODY SPRAYS AND COLOGNEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 31, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 11, 2005CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 2, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 22, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2004ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance