Drawing for LIVING RESORTS

USPTO serial 78251988

LIVING RESORTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVING RESORTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID L SIGALOW

DAVID L SIGALOW ALLEN DYER DOPPELT MILBRATH ET AL255 S ORANGE AVE STE 1401ORLANDO, FL 32801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, namely, non-medicated skin care creams, soaps, shampoos, conditioners, suntan creams and lotions, bath salts and waxes; medicated soapsACTIVE—
011Water purification units for use in treatment of potable water and wastewater for domestic, industrial, educational and ecological system uses and parts therefor sold together as a unit, namely, filters, pumps, tanks, screens, fluid beds, pipes, reactors and organic matter for use in water treatmentACTIVE—
037Resort development and resort development consulting services; building and resort construction servicesACTIVE—
040Wastewater treatment, reclamation and reuse servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 17, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 9, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 27, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 26, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 1, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 15, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 7, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance