USPTO serial 78252091
EIGHT HEARTS ETERNAL PERFECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EIGHT HEARTS ETERNAL PERFECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Camps Bay, Western Cape Province, ZA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Brewster
WILLIAM H BREWSTER KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLPSTE 28001100 PEACHTREE STATLANTA, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry including earrings, tie clips, tie pins, necklaces, bracelets, pendants, brooches and rings; precious and semi-precious stones, including diamonds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |