Drawing for EPLAN

USPTO serial 78252183

EPLAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3012873Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 8, 2005
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPLAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edwin S. Flores

EDWIN S FLORES CHALKER FLORES LLP2711 LBJ FREEWAY, STE 1036DALLAS, TX 75234UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Transmission of reliable, rapid facility information to emergency responders in the event of an emergency via a global telecommunications networkSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMay 1, 1999
042Computer services, namely, integrating emergency response contingency plans, compiling, handling, filing, updating, distributing and maintaining hazardous material informationSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMay 1, 1999
045Tracking the filing and maintenance of emergency response plansSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMay 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2007C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Nov 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 23, 2005C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Nov 23, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 16, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 27, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance