USPTO serial 78252460
ENVIOS DE DINERO EL PUENTE ENTRE TU Y ELLOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENVIOS DE DINERO EL PUENTE ENTRE TU Y ELLOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry H. Skillman
HENRY H SKILLMAN DANN, DORFMAN, HERRELL AND SKILLMAN1601 MARKET ST STE 2400PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Banking services, insurance brokerage services and consultation; monetary exchange; financial analysis and consultation; financial planning and portfolio management; and real estate consultation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BBVA Bancomer, S.A. Institucion De Banca Multiple, Grupo Financiero BBVA Bancomer
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named ENVIOS DE DINERO EL PUENTE ENTRE TU Y ELLOS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |