Drawing for SAVOY OF LONDON

USPTO serial 78252517

SAVOY OF LONDON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SAVOY OF LONDON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE S KARTIGANER

JASON M DRANGEL EPSTEIN DRANGEL BAZERMAN & JAMES LLP60 E 42ND ST STE 820NEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus and installations for lighting; lamps; lampshades; lightshades; light fittings; fixtures and fittings for lighting; light bulbs; lanterns; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods; furniture; mirrors; picture frames; Paints; varnishes; lacquers; stainers; preservatives; colouring preparations; wood fillers; preparations for providing a finish to wood surfaces; wood stains; mastics; rubber coatings; oils for the treatment of wood; oils for the preservation of wood; hand tools; cutlery; knives; forks; spoons; -metallic building materials; tiles; floor tiles; wall tiles; textiles and textile goods; bed covers; table covers; sheets; tablecloths; napkins; towels; tea towels; bath mats and covers; cushion covers; pillowcases; duvet covers; wall paper; wall coverings; borders; friezes; floor coverings; carpets; rugs; mats; carpet tiles; linoleum; domestic utensils and containers, tableware, glassware, articles of porcelain, earthenware, glass, vases, candle holdersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance