USPTO serial 78252678
QU ATTACHÉ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3037504Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 3, 2006
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with QU ATTACHÉ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Uyen Ngo
UYEN NGO INHOUSE ATTORNEYS PC2755 BRISTOL ST STE 130COSTA MESA, CA 92626-5985UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | HOUSEHOLD LINENS, NAMELY, SHEETS, COMFORTER, DUVET COVERS, BLANKETS, QUILTS, THROWS, BEDSPREADS, COVERLETS, DUST RUFFLES, SHAMS, PILLOW COVERS, PILLOW SHAMS, TOWELS, DRAPERIES, FABRIC PLACE MATS, FABRIC TABLECLOTHS, CURTAINS, AND CLOTH NAPKINS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2004 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |