Drawing for CIMS COMPLETE

USPTO serial 78252937

CIMS COMPLETE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CIMS COMPLETE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas G. Verge

Douglas G. Verge Sheehan Phinney Bass + Green, PA1000 Elm Street P.O. Box 3701Manchester, NH 03105-3701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for manipulating, storing, archiving, retrieving, securing, distributing, and disseminating over private networks and the Internet, medical and diagnostic images and multimedia electronic patient records; computer monitors for the display of medical and clinical diagnostic imagesACTIVE—
037PROVIDING MAINTENANCE AND/OR REPAIR OF CLINICAL DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING AND MULTIMEDIA ELECTRONIC PATIENT RECORDATION EQUIPMENTACTIVE—
042PROVIDING MAINTENANCE AND/OR REPAIR OF CLINICAL DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING AND MULTIMEDIA ELECTRONIC PATIENT RECORDATION SOFTWARE; AND PROVIDING DESIGN OF CLINICAL DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING AND MULTIMEDIA ELECTRONIC PATIENT RECORDATION SOFTWAREACTIVE—
044HEALTH CARE CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING DEPLOYMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF CLINICAL DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING AND MULTIMEDIA ELECTRONIC PATIENT RECORDATION SOFTWARE AND EQUIPMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 10, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 9, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 9, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 10, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 10, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 10, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 15, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 26, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 16, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 30, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 28, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance