USPTO serial 78253024
PEAKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEAKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Marrero
Michael A. Marrero Ulmer & Berne LLP600 Vine StreetSuite 2800Cincinnati, OH 45202-2409Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | magnetic resonance imagers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |