Drawing for VERICARD

USPTO serial 78253401

VERICARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VERICARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randy A. Gregory

RANDY A GREGORY GREGORY IP LAW OFFICEPO BOX 31090SPOKANE, WA 99223-3018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Blank and encoded magnetic and electronic chip cards for use in connection with financial transactions and identificationABANDONED—
036Financial services in the nature of accepting payment for others by accepting magnetic and electronic chip cards as payment in a retail purchase, rental or other retail purchase transactions accepted by retail merchants; Financial services in the nature of processing and settlement of electronic payments accepted by retail merchants in a retail transaction paid by accepting magnetic and electronic chip cards; Services in the nature of issuing encoded magnetic and electronic chip identification cards for use in making electronic payments and for identifying the bearer during financial transactions; Encoded magnetic and electronic chip card verification and transaction processingABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 29, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 29, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance