Drawing for MAIN ST. BISTRO

USPTO serial 78253564

MAIN ST. BISTRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAIN ST. BISTRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael L. Lovitz, Esq.

MICHAEL L LOVITZ ESQ CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLPP O BOX 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Refrigerated meal kits containing packages of meatballs, meatloaf, or other prepared meat products, and a separate package of mashed potatoes or macaroni and cheese sold to retail grocery stores; refrigerated prepared side dishes consisting primarily of potato sold to retail grocery storesACTIVE—
030Refrigerated prepared side dishes consisting primarily of rice, pasta or macaroni sold to retail grocery storesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 31, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 31, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 8, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 16, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 16, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 3, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 27, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 14, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance