USPTO serial 78253893
AWESOME!!!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AWESOME!!!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen G. Janoski
BRYAN PAUL SUGAR WILDMAN HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP225 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-1229UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | FURNITURE, PILLOWS, CUSHIONS, MATTRESSES AND BOX SPRINGS, SLEEPING BAGS, PICTURE FRAMES, HAND HELD MIRRORS AND WALL MIRRORS, WINDOW BLINDS AND WINDOW SHADES, CURTAIN RODS AND DRAPERY RODS, JEWELRY BOXES NOT MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; PLAQUES; MOSAICS NOT FOR BUILDINGS MADE OF WOOD, PLASTIC, PLASTER, BONE, WAX OR POLY RESIN; DECORATIVE BOXES, FIGURINES, STATUES, AND STATUETTES ALL MADE OF WOOD, PLASTIC, PLASTER, BONE, WAX OR POLY RESIN; DESK ORNAMENTS MADE OF WOOD, PLASTIC, OR PLASTER; MAGAZINE RACKS; STORAGE RACKS, PLASTIC DRINKING STRAWS, PLASTIC FLAGS, PLASTIC BANNERS, PLASTIC PENNANTS, DECORATIVE HAND FANS, NON-METAL LETTER BOXES, DECORATIVE MOBILES AND SOFT SCULPTURE WALL DECORATIONS; KEY FOBS, KEY CHAINS, KEY RINGS, AND KEY HOLDERS ALL NOT MADE OF METAL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |