USPTO serial 78253895
AWESOME!!!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AWESOME!!!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan P. Sugar
BRYAN P SUGAR SCHWARTZ COOPER CHARTERED180 N LASALLE ST STE 2700CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | BEVERAGE GLASSWARE; BEVERAGE WARE; MUGS, CUPS, PITCHERS, AND DECANTERS MADE OF PAPER, PLASTIC, GLASS, CRYSTAL, CHINA, EARTHENWARE, STONEWARE OR PORCELAIN; TABLEWARE NAMELY, PLATES, DISHES, CUPS, BOWLS, SAUCERS AND PLATTERS MADE OF PAPER, PLASTIC, GLASS, CRYSTAL, CHINA, EARTHENWARE, STONEWARE OR PORCELAIN; VASES;NAPKIN HOLDER NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; BOWLS AND PLATTERS MADE OF WOOD, CERAMICS, OR STAINLESS STEEL; NON-ELECTRIC COOKWARE, NAMELY, POTS, PANS, ROASTERS, STEAMERS, COOKERY MOLDS, WHISKS, LADLES, SPATULAS, COOKING SPOONS AND MIXING SPOONS; DISH DRYING RACKS, KNIFE BLOCKS, BAKE WARE, SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS, MANUALLY OPERATED SALT AND PEPPER GRINDERS; PORTABLE COOLERS FOR BEVERAGES AND FOOD BUT EXCLUDING CONTAINERS FOR FOOD OR BEVERAGES AND EXCLUDING PLASTIC COVERS, PLASTIC BAGS OR PLASTIC WRAP FOR FOOD OR BEVERAGES; COCKTAIL PICKS AND TOOTHPICKS; ROLLING PINS, CUTTING BOARDS, BAKING SHEETS, PASTRY BRUSHES; NON-METAL PIGGY BANKS, LUNCH BOXES; NON-ELECTRIC COFFEE POTS AND INSULATED JUGS NOT MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; FRENCH PRESSES, NAMELY, NON-ELECTRIC COFFEE MAKERS AND NON-ELECTRIC TEA POTS AND TEA BALLS NOT MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; BUCKETS NOT MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; DECORATIVE PLATES; COSMETIC BRUSHES, HAIR COMBS, HAIRBRUSHES, TOOTHBRUSHES, TOOTHBRUSH HOLDERS, WASTE PAPER BINS, SOAP DISHES AND SOAP DISPENSERS; CANDLESTICKS AND CANDLE HOLDERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; FIGURINES, ORNAMENTS, BASKETS, STATUES, STATUETTES MADE OF GLASS, CRYSTAL, CHINA, CERAMICS, EARTHENWARE, PORCELAIN OR POTTERY BUT EXCLUDING CONTAINERS FOR KITCHEN AND HOUSEHOLD USE AND EXCLUDING COVERS, PLASTIC BAGS OR PLASTIC WRAP FOR FOOD OR BEVERAGES; FLOWER POTS AND PLANT POTS; NON-ELECTRIC CANDELABRAS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; NON-METAL BASKETS COMPOSED OF WICKER OR WOOD; FITTED PICNIC BASKETS; BOTTLE OPENERS AND CORKSCREWS, PLASTIC COASTERS AND COASTERS NOT MADE OF LINEN OR PAPER; CLEANING SUPPLIES, NAMELY, BROOMS, BRUSHES, MOPS, FEATHER DUSTERS, FURNITURE DUSTERS, PAILS AND SPONGES ALL FOR HOUSEHOLD USE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |