USPTO serial 78254120
VIVIANE WOODARD AGELESS SKIN REJUVENATING SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3021716Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2005
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIVIANE WOODARD AGELESS SKIN REJUVENATING SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodinville, WA
Woodinville, WA
Issaquah, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT G WARNER
SCOTT WARNER1191 2ND AVE 18 FLSEATTLE, WA 98101-3438UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EYE SHADOW, EYEBROW PENCIL, EYELASH LINER PENCIL, MASCARA, SKIN FRESHENING CREAM AND LOTION, FACIAL CLEANSERS IN THE FORM OF LOTIONS AND CREAMS, SKIN MOISTURIZER, EYE AND THROAT EMOLLIENT, SKIN DISCOLORATION COVER-UP, LIQUID MAKE-UP BASE, ROUGE, TRANSLUCENT FACE POWDER, DUSTING POWDER, COLOGNE, AFTER SHAVE LOTION, COSMETIC BODY LOTION, TALC FOR PERSONAL CARE, DEODORANT STICK FOR PERSONAL CARE, PERFUME, HAND AND BODY LOTION, BODY SHAMPOO, AFTER-BATH BODY LOTION WITH FRAGRANCE, FACIAL MOISTURIZING LOTION, LIQUID MAKE-UP BASE, BLEMISH STICK, BRUSH-ON POWDERED COLORING, EYEBROW PENCIL, EYE SHADOW, LIPSTICK, LIP LINER PENCIL, FACIAL MOISTURIZER, FACIAL CREAM, FACIAL SKIN ASTRINGENT FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, EYE AND THROAT OIL, EXTERNAL BODY CLEANSER CONSISTING OF LOTIONS AND CREAMS, MILK BATH, HAND AND BODY LOTION, HAIR SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONER, HAIR THICKENING COLOGNE, SCENTED BODY LOTION, NAIL STRENGTHENING POLISH, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, NAIL BASE COAT, CUTICLE CREAM, SUN TAN LOTION, SUN TAN OIL, PERSONAL DEODORANT SPRAY, PERSONAL DEODORANT ROLL-ON, BODY TALC, LIQUID HAND SOAP, HAIR THICKENING LOTION, HAIR SPRAY, MEN'S COLOGNE, MEN'S AFTER SHAVE BALM, CREAM CONDITIONER CONTAINING SKIN NUTRIENTS; SKIN TONERS, NON- MEDICATED SKIN MOISTURIZERS, SEMI- MATTE FOUNDATION MAKE-UP, MEN'S BODY SOAP, BODY MOISTURIZING LOTION, SKIN FIRMING LOTION, SKIN TONING LOTION, ALPHA HYDROXY, AND ANTI-AGEING COSMETICS FORMULATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 15, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |