USPTO serial 78254127
AGELESS SYSTEMS BY VIVIANE WOODARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AGELESS SYSTEMS BY VIVIANE WOODARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Issaquah, WA
Issaquah, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT G WARNER
SCOT G WARNER GARVEY SHCUBERT BARER1191 2ND AVE FL 18SEATTLE, WA 98101-3438UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EYE SHADOW, EYEBROW PENCIL, EYELASH LINER PENCIL, MASCARA, SKIN FRESHENING CREAM AND LOTION, FACIAL CLEANSERS IN THE FORM OF LOTIONS AND CREAMS, SKIN MOISTURIZER, EYE AND THROAT EMOLLIENT, SKIN DISCOLORATION COVER-UP, LIQUID MAKE-UP BASE, ROUGE, TRANSLUCENT FACE POWDER, DUSTING POWDER, COLOGNE, AFTER SHAVE LOTION, COSMETIC BODY LOTION, TALC FOR PERSONAL CARE, DEODORANT STICK FOR PERSONAL CARE, PERFUME, HAND AND BODY LOTION, BODY SHAMPOO, AFTER-BATH BODY LOTION WITH FRAGRANCE, FACIAL MOISTURIZING LOTION, LIQUID MAKE- UP BASE, BLEMISH STICK, BRUSH-ON POWDERED COLORING, EYEBROW PENCIL, EYE SHADOW, LIPSTICK, LIP LINER PENCIL, FACIAL MOISTURIZER, FACIAL CREAM, FACIAL SKIN ASTRINGENT FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, EYE AND THROAT OIL, EXTERNAL BODY CLEANSER CONSISTING OF LOTIONS AND CREAMS, MILK BATH, HAND AND BODY LOTION, HAIR SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONER, HAIR THICKENING COLOGNE, SCENTED BODY LOTION, NAIL STRENGTHENING POLISH, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, NAIL BASE COAT, CUTICLE CREAM, SUN TAN LOTION, SUN TAN OIL, PERSONAL DEODORANT SPRAY, PERSONAL DEODORANT ROLL-ON, BODY TALC, LIQUID HAND SOAP, HAIR THICKENING LOTION, HAIR SPRAY, MEN'S COLOGNE, MEN'S AFTER SHAVE BALM, SKIN TONERS, NON- MEDICATED SKIN MOISTURIZERS, SEMI- MATTE FOUNDATION MAKE-UP, MEN'S BODY SOAP, BODY MOISTURIZING LOTION, SKIN FIRMING LOTION, SKIN TONING LOTION | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |