USPTO serial 78254251
CAFE ROMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAFE ROMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
.Stephen N. Hollman
STEPHEN N HOLLMAN BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP160 W SANTA CLARA ST STE 1050SAN JOSE, CA 95113-1732UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail shops, mail order services, telephone shop-at-home, and online retail store services featuring coffee and tea; Retail shops, mail order services, telephone shop-at-home, and online retail store services featuring coffee and tea | ACTIVE | Jan 3, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |