Drawing for CERATHERM

USPTO serial 78254377

CERATHERM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CERATHERM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. Patch

Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Containers not of precious metal for kitchen or household use; goods made of glassware, porcelain and/or earthenware, namely, beverage ware, bake ware, baking dishes, mugs,spice racks, coffee cups, non-electric coffee pots, non-electric coffee makers, non-electric coffee servers, plates, bowls, casseroles, dishes, dish stands, salad bowls, spoons, forks,cups, storage jars, thermal insulated containers for food or beverages, insulated flasks, heat-insulated vessels, meal Trays, serving trays, serving platters, dispensers for liquid soap, soap holders, soap containers, soap dishes, cake rests, cake servers, cake stands, butter dishes, napkin holders, cruet stands for oil, vinegar and other cooking or edible liquids, condiment holders and servers, serving forks, serving ladles, kitchen ladles, serving spoons, serving tongs, serving ware for food, bread boards, bread boxes, cookie jars, storage jars, insulating jars, salt and pepper and other spice shakers, spatulas, dish drying racks, kitchen utensil racks, bottle openers, whisks, dispensers for paper towels, cutting boards, household utensil strainers,mixing spoons, cookie sheets, cooking skewersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 16, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 9, 2004CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 7, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance