USPTO serial 78254389
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Neuquen (8300), Neuquen Province, AR
Neuquen (8300), Neuquen Province, AR
Neuquen (8300), Neuquen Province, AR
CIUDAD DE NEUQUEN, PROVINCIA DE NEUQUEN, AR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arturo Perez-Guerrero
Arturo Pérez-Guerrero Law Offices of Arturo Pérez-GuerreroP.O. BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines, distilled spirits, whiskey, brandy, cognac, cordials, liqueurs and aperitifs with a wine base | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 10, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 22, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 6, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 4, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |