Drawing for LIFESPRING

USPTO serial 78254391

LIFESPRING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFESPRING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa Greenwald-Swire

Lisa Greenwald-Swire Fish & Richardson P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Education services, namely, conducting classes in the fields of fitness, health and wellness; wellness training, namely, health club services; providing facilities and services for exercise, physical fitness, healthACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 16, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
May 16, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
May 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 10, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 10, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Dec 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 13, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 13, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 13, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 17, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 17, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 13, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 12, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 12, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 4, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Apr 8, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION
Feb 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 13, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 22, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 21, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 30, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 10, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 2, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 30, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance