USPTO serial 78254425
MUSCLE MILK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2973352Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MUSCLE MILK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah L. Nelsen
Sarah L. Nelsen Hormel Foods Corporation1 Hormel PlaceLaw DepartmentAustin, MN 55912Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Meal replacement drinks; meal replacement and dietary supplement drink mixes; protein based, nutrient-dense meal replacement bars; and pre-mixed nutritionally fortified beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2001 |
| 029 | Protein based, nutrient-dense snack bars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 7, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 7, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 25, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |