CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MUNCH

USPTO serial 78254617

MUNCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUNCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Scott Gerien, Esq.

J SCOTT GERIEN1760 SPRUCE STNAPA, CA 94559UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, a television series about cooking; educational services, namely, providing classes, workshops and camps in the field of cooking; special event planning services, namely, organizing cooking contests and events for the general publicACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 23, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 23, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 31, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance